<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flash IDE Bugbase?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tink.ws/blog/flash-ide-bugbase/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tink.ws/blog/flash-ide-bugbase/</link>
	<description>Flash Platform development and personal rants.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 20:46:47 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tink</title>
		<link>http://www.tink.ws/blog/flash-ide-bugbase/#comment-157973</link>
		<dc:creator>Tink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tink.ws/blog/flash-ide-bugbase/#comment-157973</guid>
		<description>@ lee

Its pretty basic bud. You create you assets in your FLA and export them for ActionsScript, publish with create SWC checked.

In FB you right click on your project, select Flex/ActionScript Build Path -&gt; Library Path -&gt; Add SWC, and locate your SWC. You can now create any instance of the classes in your SWC.

This will mean that all those assets are compiled into your FB app. If you were building a game or something you might want to load the assets when required (i.e. per level or something), if so take a look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tink.ws/blog/library-librarymanager/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Library &amp; LibraryManager&lt;/a&gt;.

Please reply if that stuff don&#039;t make sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ lee</p>
<p>Its pretty basic bud. You create you assets in your FLA and export them for ActionsScript, publish with create SWC checked.</p>
<p>In FB you right click on your project, select Flex/ActionScript Build Path -&gt; Library Path -&gt; Add SWC, and locate your SWC. You can now create any instance of the classes in your SWC.</p>
<p>This will mean that all those assets are compiled into your FB app. If you were building a game or something you might want to load the assets when required (i.e. per level or something), if so take a look at <a href="http://www.tink.ws/blog/library-librarymanager/" rel="nofollow">Library &amp; LibraryManager</a>.</p>
<p>Please reply if that stuff don&#8217;t make sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lee</title>
		<link>http://www.tink.ws/blog/flash-ide-bugbase/#comment-157969</link>
		<dc:creator>lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 07:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tink.ws/blog/flash-ide-bugbase/#comment-157969</guid>
		<description>@Tink - would love to see an example of your SWC to FB workflow (creation, publish, import, implement).  I&#039;ve finally stepped out of the Flash IDE to code in eclipse with the Flex plugin.  Brimelow&#039;s snippets plug and screenshots made me.  I&#039;m getting a hang of the Subversive svn, and overall am blown away with eclipse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tink &#8211; would love to see an example of your SWC to FB workflow (creation, publish, import, implement).  I&#8217;ve finally stepped out of the Flash IDE to code in eclipse with the Flex plugin.  Brimelow&#8217;s snippets plug and screenshots made me.  I&#8217;m getting a hang of the Subversive svn, and overall am blown away with eclipse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.tink.ws/blog/flash-ide-bugbase/#comment-157596</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 15:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tink.ws/blog/flash-ide-bugbase/#comment-157596</guid>
		<description>&quot;Do something about it then.&quot;

Tink beat me to it. Adobe sees the value in creating a public bugbase for some aspects of swf development -- why would you not do the same for the Flash IDE?

&quot;If an issue is widespread, we ask tech support to add a tech note.&quot;

If you know a bug is going to cost each person who runs into it hours in lost development time, you should let developers know about it. How &quot;widespread&quot; the bug is shouldn&#039;t be a consideration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Do something about it then.&#8221;</p>
<p>Tink beat me to it. Adobe sees the value in creating a public bugbase for some aspects of swf development &#8212; why would you not do the same for the Flash IDE?</p>
<p>&#8220;If an issue is widespread, we ask tech support to add a tech note.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you know a bug is going to cost each person who runs into it hours in lost development time, you should let developers know about it. How &#8220;widespread&#8221; the bug is shouldn&#8217;t be a consideration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tink</title>
		<link>http://www.tink.ws/blog/flash-ide-bugbase/#comment-157548</link>
		<dc:creator>Tink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tink.ws/blog/flash-ide-bugbase/#comment-157548</guid>
		<description>&quot;We realize it can be frustrating to not know the status of a bug,&quot;

Do something about it then.

&quot;but rest assured that if you do submit a bug, we investigate the bug and try to fix it.&quot;

Yup i got that.

&quot;Adobe has a public bugbase for Flash Player, ActionScript 3.0 compiler (ASC), Flex, FlexBuilder, etc. because all or part of these products are open-source. &quot;

I don&#039;t think anyone is asking for you to open source the IDE (i.e. let us see the code, let us contribute code), but instead if I spend time submitting a bug, somewhere where I can at any time see its status, and how many others have the same problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We realize it can be frustrating to not know the status of a bug,&#8221;</p>
<p>Do something about it then.</p>
<p>&#8220;but rest assured that if you do submit a bug, we investigate the bug and try to fix it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yup i got that.</p>
<p>&#8220;Adobe has a public bugbase for Flash Player, ActionScript 3.0 compiler (ASC), Flex, FlexBuilder, etc. because all or part of these products are open-source. &#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think anyone is asking for you to open source the IDE (i.e. let us see the code, let us contribute code), but instead if I spend time submitting a bug, somewhere where I can at any time see its status, and how many others have the same problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nivesh</title>
		<link>http://www.tink.ws/blog/flash-ide-bugbase/#comment-157546</link>
		<dc:creator>Nivesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tink.ws/blog/flash-ide-bugbase/#comment-157546</guid>
		<description>Hi Tink,

Adobe has a public bugbase for Flash Player, ActionScript 3.0 compiler (ASC), Flex, FlexBuilder, etc. because all or part of these products are open-source.  We have had requests to make the Flash IDE&#039;s bugbase searchable to the public, but there are no immediate plans for this.

However, when a person submits a bug through the support portal, we usually reply to acknowledge the submission, to provide workarounds, or to ask for more steps.  If an issue is widespread, we ask tech support to add a tech note.  The current tech notes can be viewed at http://www.adobe.com/support/flash/

We appreciate your comments via our support portal or adobe forums because they help us improve our products.  We realize it can be frustrating to not know the status of a bug, but rest assured that if you do submit a bug, we investigate the bug and try to fix it.

Thanks,
Nivesh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tink,</p>
<p>Adobe has a public bugbase for Flash Player, ActionScript 3.0 compiler (ASC), Flex, FlexBuilder, etc. because all or part of these products are open-source.  We have had requests to make the Flash IDE&#8217;s bugbase searchable to the public, but there are no immediate plans for this.</p>
<p>However, when a person submits a bug through the support portal, we usually reply to acknowledge the submission, to provide workarounds, or to ask for more steps.  If an issue is widespread, we ask tech support to add a tech note.  The current tech notes can be viewed at <a href="http://www.adobe.com/support/flash/" rel="nofollow">http://www.adobe.com/support/flash/</a></p>
<p>We appreciate your comments via our support portal or adobe forums because they help us improve our products.  We realize it can be frustrating to not know the status of a bug, but rest assured that if you do submit a bug, we investigate the bug and try to fix it.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Nivesh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://www.tink.ws/blog/flash-ide-bugbase/#comment-157545</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tink.ws/blog/flash-ide-bugbase/#comment-157545</guid>
		<description>@Michael:

It sounds like you have different OS color schemes on the two computers. The layer and frame selection is affected by the color scheme selection on the operating system. If you go into Display Properties (right-click the desktop and choose properties), go to the Appearance tab and see which Color Scheme is selected. I suspect Blue is selected on one machine and something like Silver on the other.

Hope that helps,
Jen.
Adobe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Michael:</p>
<p>It sounds like you have different OS color schemes on the two computers. The layer and frame selection is affected by the color scheme selection on the operating system. If you go into Display Properties (right-click the desktop and choose properties), go to the Appearance tab and see which Color Scheme is selected. I suspect Blue is selected on one machine and something like Silver on the other.</p>
<p>Hope that helps,<br />
Jen.<br />
Adobe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tink</title>
		<link>http://www.tink.ws/blog/flash-ide-bugbase/#comment-157537</link>
		<dc:creator>Tink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tink.ws/blog/flash-ide-bugbase/#comment-157537</guid>
		<description>Hi Nivesh

That may we&#039;ll be the case but without being able to see any status, get any feedback and see how many other people are experiencing the same problem it&#039;s not really a solution IMO.

Adobe get the Flash IDE in your bugbase before someone creates their own where the community can log Flash IDE bugs, or provide a decent reason why this shouldn&#039;t be the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nivesh</p>
<p>That may we&#8217;ll be the case but without being able to see any status, get any feedback and see how many other people are experiencing the same problem it&#8217;s not really a solution IMO.</p>
<p>Adobe get the Flash IDE in your bugbase before someone creates their own where the community can log Flash IDE bugs, or provide a decent reason why this shouldn&#8217;t be the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nivesh</title>
		<link>http://www.tink.ws/blog/flash-ide-bugbase/#comment-157497</link>
		<dc:creator>Nivesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tink.ws/blog/flash-ide-bugbase/#comment-157497</guid>
		<description>Hi Tink,

We definitely investigate the bug reports and feature requests submitted via http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform.

Lee, regarding your post about slow compilation in CS4 -- Can you post such a FLA?

Thanks,
Nivesh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tink,</p>
<p>We definitely investigate the bug reports and feature requests submitted via <a href="http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform" rel="nofollow">http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform</a>.</p>
<p>Lee, regarding your post about slow compilation in CS4 &#8212; Can you post such a FLA?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Nivesh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tink</title>
		<link>http://www.tink.ws/blog/flash-ide-bugbase/#comment-157438</link>
		<dc:creator>Tink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 15:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tink.ws/blog/flash-ide-bugbase/#comment-157438</guid>
		<description>@Michael

I can confirm my keyframes highlight blue. Can&#039;t comment on whether its a bug your experiencing though bud. I guess none of us will even know means there&#039;s nowhere you can submit it and get feedback.

You not far from Adobe right? Maybe if you put a note in a bottle it might get to them and they might send a response back via paper airplane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Michael</p>
<p>I can confirm my keyframes highlight blue. Can&#8217;t comment on whether its a bug your experiencing though bud. I guess none of us will even know means there&#8217;s nowhere you can submit it and get feedback.</p>
<p>You not far from Adobe right? Maybe if you put a note in a bottle it might get to them and they might send a response back via paper airplane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tink</title>
		<link>http://www.tink.ws/blog/flash-ide-bugbase/#comment-157352</link>
		<dc:creator>Tink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tink.ws/blog/flash-ide-bugbase/#comment-157352</guid>
		<description>@ Lee

I haven&#039;t noticed, but I&#039;m just publishing not viewing the SWF, as I&#039;m only interested in the SWC created for use in FB. I&#039;m not sure I would notice any speed change in compiling.

That said I&#039;ve read a few posts about people who find it heavy and slow in general.

As I understand it now uses the same compiler as Flex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Lee</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t noticed, but I&#8217;m just publishing not viewing the SWF, as I&#8217;m only interested in the SWC created for use in FB. I&#8217;m not sure I would notice any speed change in compiling.</p>
<p>That said I&#8217;ve read a few posts about people who find it heavy and slow in general.</p>
<p>As I understand it now uses the same compiler as Flex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
