flash = Flash Player & AIR
fl = Flash
mx = Flex & AIR
air = AIR
Make any sense? Explicit for new users? Does anyone know why the legacy mx is still around?
A while back I suggested the following, and it was brought up in conversation again the other day…
player = Flash Player
flash = Flash
flex = Flex
air = AIR
To be honest I thought the feature request would get quashed straight away, but it’s still there and open. Want to see package names cleaned up for future releases? It’s up to us!

That would make everything easier
Great idea Tink. I’ll go comment in the bug base to reinforce it.
There definitely needs to be something done, because as it is right now, it’s soup. Great idea on your break down of the names, though.
Its a cool idea Tink. By the way long time no see. How are things?
Yeah I’m very good bud. FOTB?
Will we see you in the bar this time?
[...] ow? AS3, Flash AS4 naming conventions05.06.08 | Comment? I just read Tink’s post on the nonsensical names of the core ActionScript packages: flash, fl, mx and air. In [...]
It is a nice suggestion Tink. It is annoying to use nonsense package names like mx etc. It is a good idea to have
player = Flash Player
flash = Flash
flex = Flex
air = AIR
[...] kage names campaign! show your support!07.22.08 | Comment? The bug reported by Tink on sensible package names for Flash/Flex/AIR is open. I have also made some refinement suggest [...]
With that and threading I would be a happy boy
Changing packages of existing code would have some pretty huge compatibility problems. But we are working on packaging guidelines for our stuff moving forward.
Hey Matt
Pretty much why I thought the suggestion would be quashed straight away. That said the package name are in a pretty mixed up state at the moment.